Standard 9: Curriculum Design
Standard 9
states teacher leaders evaluate and use effective curriculum design. To
accomplish this learning goal, I took the course Curriculum Design in the the
summer of 2018. From this course I
learned how to properly design a unit of instruction within a music context.
One interesting aspect is that this course was taken simultaneously as I
completed my Kodaly certification (a specific pedagogical style of music
education). Both my Kodaly course and
the Curriculum Design course focused around planning large music units.
Prior to the Curriculum Design course I
had two main thoughts. First, I knew I
had a lack of comprehensive unit planning, specifically in the middle school
area. My training and coursework thus
far in my career did not prepare me for middle school general music, something
that is highly uncommon. I have been designing the curriculums in a “trial by
fire” method and relying on student feedback to implement necessary
changes. Second, I reflected on my
assessment methods and realized I rely too heavily on a couple of assessments
modalities. My methods are not diverse
enough to ensure all students have an opportunity to display their learning in
a manner that suits them.
Reflection:
Through
completion of EDU 6524, I have gained new perspective on curriculum
design. The three big takeaways are as
follows:
1.
Effective
teaching ensures standards are taught and assessed
2.
Quality
curriculum design utilizes organizing centers focused on concepts and not
topics
3.
Effective
teaching employs a multitude of assessment modalities
1. Effective teaching ensures standards
are taught and assessed.
Standards
should be viewed in three ways: addressed, taught, and taught and assessed
(Lalor, 2016). Each viewpoint has its own benefits and one is not superior to
another. However, effective teaching
ensures by the end of the unit, trimester, and year, standards have been taught
and assessed. Much to often standards are simply written on the board, lesson
plan, or verbally mentioned to students. What evidence can teachers provide to
show each standard has been taught and assessed? By placing emphasis on
teaching and assessing standards we are prioritizing the standard, developing
learning targets, communicating those learning targets, and developing appropriate
learning activities (Lalor, 2016).
2. Quality curriculum design utilizes
organizing centers to focus on concepts, not topics.
In pushing
students to a deeper level of understanding teachers must focus on instructing
concepts, not topics as the latter merely requires students to memorize and
regurgitate information. Through organizing centers, a central idea in which a
unit is centered around (Lalor, 2016), teachers can develop and instruct
thought provoking units. The use of organizing centers is important as the
material can be explored from many angles, thus engaging the students. The material is meaningful because the end
product (the concept taught) is focused on something bigger than the students
(Lalor, 2016).
3. Effective teaching employs a multitude
of assessment modalities.
Teachers
must diligently and purposefully asses their students on the curriculum
instructed. In properly measuring
student success, a wide range of assessment strategies must be employed. This ensures two things: 1) Multiple
assessment modalities provide more information regarding what the students know
and are able to do, and under what conditions (Lalor, 2016). 2) Multiple
assessment modalities allow more opportunities for student success as
instruction is differentiated to all learning styles.
On a similar note, educators must
ensure all standards are assessed throughout the year. As stated by Rebecca Alber (2014), certain
standards can be focused on too much, not giving enough attention to the
others.This task is surprisingly difficult in specialist classes when the
curriculum is typically weighted to one or two standards.
Lastly,
it is important to assess the actual skill you are trying to assess. It sounds trivial, but more often than not I
realize there's some other variable interacting with the skill i’m trying to
assess in the students. As stated by
Jnell Bjorklund (N.D.), respected Kodaly educator, “Target the actual skill or
knowledge you want to assess.” Sounds simple, but is actually quite tricky to
accomplish.
Future Teaching Implementation:
These three takeaways impact my
teaching as I will focus on ensuring standards are taught and assessed,
expanding my view from topic to concept, and employing a multitude of
assessment strategies to ensure opportunities for student success. All three ideas provide clarity and intention
in my practice. These ideas also provide
students with more opportunities to display their understanding and demonstrate
confidence in what they know. Lastly,
these ideas provide for a student-centered classroom as learners are given more
freedom to discover and demonstrate learning.
With my new understanding of effective curriculum design I will
reevaluate my current curriculums utilizing the same ideas presented in the
Lalor readings. Each unit, particularly
at the middle school level, will use an organizing center to ensure the areas
of focus are concept focused with room for students to discover their own
learning. As mentioned by Mariko Nobori
(2011) in the article “5 Strategies to Ensure Students Learning”, a school in
Arizona encourages teacher to focus on one or two standards a week and
thoroughly assess those standards at the end of the week. I might experiment with this type of
compartmentalization when spreading the standards out throughout the year.
In
my current state, this course deeply affected my ability to plan, specifically
the middle school curriculum. As I
mentioned before the units should focus on concepts and not topics. This Spring, the sixth grade music class is
focusing on the concept of inferences, through the vehicle of world music. I’m finding the students are more engaged in
the learning process as it is clear what skill we are building. Students are grasping why this class is
important, because they see the tool we are developing so clearly.
A
deep understanding and effective application of learning from this course
standard are paramount for teacher leaders.
Quality curriculum design is the roadmap to student learning. As stated
by Priya Gard (2018), “Curriculum should be defined by the outcomes you want
your students to obtain”. These outcomes
are the desired destinations of the roadmap.
If units of study are designed properly, with care and thought, the
students will engage more, take ownership, and ultimately have a better
experience in the classroom.
Link to relevant coursework:
My curriculum map for 4th grade
Sources:
Alber, R.
(2014). Teaching students not standards. Retrieved from
https://www.edutopia.org/blog/teaching-students-not-standards-rebecca-alber
Bjorklund,
J. (N.D.). Assessment in the primary grades. Retrieved from
http://depaulkodaly.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/4/5/14455574/assessment_in_primary_grades_cake_2015.pdf
Garg, P.
(2018) Curriculum design [PowerPoint
slides]. Retreived from
http://www.bumc.bu.edu/bumg/files/2015/07/Curriculum-Design-_Garg_5_24_18.pdf
Lalor, A.
(2016). Ensuring high-quality curriculum: How to design, revise, or adopt
curriculum aligned to student
success. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD.
Nobori, M.
(2011). 5 strategies to ensure student learning. Retrieved from
https://www.edutopia.org/stw-differentiated-instruction-budget-assessment-how-to
Comments
Post a Comment