Standard 11: Standards-Based Assessment
Reflection:
Standard 11 states teacher leaders utilize formative and summative assessments in a standards based
environment. To gain knowledge and
skills surrounding this important aspect of teaching, I engaged in a multitude
of learning activities in the course “Standards-Based Assessment”.
Prior to EDU 6613 I knew my
assessment practices needed some adjustments.
The school in which I work, already uses standards-based grading, and we
have received quality instruction on how to best implement this assessment style. However I still did not feel
confident in the ways I assessed students.
After the first couple weeks of the class I formulated two areas of focus for my teaching and assessment practice. These two areas are: 1)
Communicating learning expectations to students. 2) Giving effective feedback
in diverse ways.
Students in my class have voiced
their concerns on “why do we need to know this?”. Something I put in the back of my mind is
unpacking what the learning target or unit goal is and what it is asking of the
students. Sharing the learning
expectation is crucial for student engagement but it also sets up the
assessment at the end. By clearly
defining and communicating the learning expectations, the students know what it
is their doing, but more importantly what it looks like to be successful with
their learning. This unpacking creates a
clear path for the students to walk down.
Second, effective feedback was addressed
in module four as well as my “Assessment into Action” paper. Through my interaction with peers in the
discussion board, as well as the research process, I discovered many useful
strategies and ideas to implement into my classroom. From John Hattie (2007), I learned three
essential questions in which all feedback should answer: “Where am I going? How
am I going? Where to next?” (p. 86). These three questions should be used as a
rubric for the teacher to assess their own feedback given to the students, ensuring
the information is communicated thoroughly and addresses all aspects of student
learning. Another resources entitled,
“Developing an Effective Teacher Feedback System” communicated the importance
of developing a culture of feedback.
Within this culture students are exposed to a high amount of feedback
that is built upon respect and trust. “Research has shown that individuals are
more likely to absorb feedback if they believe it is for their development and
growth, rather than seeing it as strictly for judgement” (Park, Takahashi, and
Taylor, 2014, p.7). Lastly, and probably
most important is the principle provided by Grant Wiggins in which “less
teaching plus more feedback is the key to achieving greater learning” (2012.). Good feedback is essentially what does the
teaching. This is the tool for leading
students to learning and uncovering the material for themselves. Quality and effective feedback is the main
driver of forward progression in the classroom.
By deepening my understanding of
sharing learning expectations, I am developing a stronger sense of the
assessment practice. What happens prior
to the assessment is important to the assessment itself. Similarly, effective feedback is focused on
the area after the assessment, which is just as important. Assessment must be
seen as a larger entity, not just a score in the grade book. Both takeaways extend my view and
understanding of what it means to implement sound assessment practices.
In the future I will implement my takeaways from this course. First, I will set
aside the necessary time to communicate, orally and/or visually, the learning
expectations. I will also engage
students in quick discussions on what that means to them. “What is your job as a student? How do you think you might accomplish this
goal? What skills are needed to complete this task? What challenges do you
think you’ll face? What do you think we’ll do with this learning?” These questions are meant to probe their
thinking about the task at hand. In
regards to feedback, I will use “Plickers” to gather assessment data as well as
implement my action plan as stated in my research paper. “Plickers” will be used sparingly as it takes
significant time, however it is a wonderful tool for assessing students in a
fun and engaging way. The action plan of
my research paper outlines three concrete steps I will take to deepen my
feedback. In summary the three steps of
my action plan are as follows:
1. Implement “Quick-and-Quiet” feedback to
challenge or praises a student’s ability and understanding.
2. Build a classroom culture of continuous
feedback
3. Utilize assessment data to deliver whole
group feedback that successfully answers the three questions of “Where am I
going? How am I going? Where to next?”
At this point in time, almost one
year after taking this course, I can honestly say I have placed even more of a
premium on quality feedback and sound assessment strategies. As I reflect more on teaching as a whole, I
have realized the importance of understanding everyone’s roles in the
classroom. As I tell my students daily,
“it is not your job to be perfect, it is your job to be better”. Or another saying you might hear is
“it is not your job to be perfect, it is your job to try your absolute
hardest”. Once students have “done their
job” of trying hard or trying to be better, it is then my job to provide
quality feedback that ensures growth or at the very least confirms the student
is on the right track. As I stated
prior, providing feedback through assessment data or some form of verbal
feedback, is the true instructional tool.
The formative and summative assessment processes, coupled with feedback
are where teachers should focus their attention. It is in this area in which we have the power
to guide students to success.
More recently, I have understood the
power of formative assessment.
Previously, I did not fully realize what a formative assessment actually
was and its purpose in the classroom.
However, through this course and other reflections, I now view formative
assessment differently. Instead of
formative and summative, I like to view assessments as being “of” learning and
“for” learning. In this case,
assessments “of” learning are summative in nature, while assessments “for”
learning are seen as information to use when gauging possible next steps. As mentioned by Joe Siedlecki (2012)“Assessment FOR learning embeds assessment processes
throughout the teaching and learning process to constantly adjust instructional
strategy”. When viewed in this frame it
becomes clear how important quality assessment practices and feedback must be
in any classroom. As beautifully stated
by Dylan William (2013) “It is only through assessment that we can discover
whether the instructional activities in which we engaged our students resulted
in the intended learning. Assessment really is the bridge between teaching and
learning” (p. 15).
Sources:
Hattie,
J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational
Research, 77, 81-112. doi 10.3102/003465430298487
Park,
S. & Takahashi, S. & White, T. (2014). Developing an effective teacher
feedback system. Retrieved from https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/CF_Feedback_90DC_2014.pdf
Siedlecki, J. (2012). Education testing: Assessment of learning versus
assessment for learning. Retreived from https://www.msdf.org/blog/2012/05/education-testing-assessment-of-learning-versus-assessment-for-learning/
Wiggins,
G. (2012). Seven keys to effective feedback. Educational Leadership, 70.
Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept12/vol70/num01/seven-keys-to-effective-feedback.aspx
William,
D. (2013). Assessment: The Bridge between teaching and learning. Voices From the Middle, 21(2), 15-20.
Artifacts:
Comments
Post a Comment